Case Study

Global AWS Landing Zone

Multi-sovereignty · SSO · Partner network integration

One platform.Many jurisdictions.

A multi-national money transfer startup needed a core AWS platform that could meet multi-sovereignty data residency and processing requirements while connecting identity and partner networks across regions. OWCER designed and built the landing zone, single sign-on foundation, and integrations with external partner and vendor networks—so application teams could ship on a platform, not on ad hoc accounts.

The problem

The company was scaling a cross-border money transfer business across multiple jurisdictions. Product and payments work could not wait for a patchwork of regional AWS accounts. Leadership needed one core cloud platform that respected multi-sovereignty constraints—Americas, EMEA, and India—while giving engineers a repeatable place to run production and non-production workloads.

Beyond networking and guardrails, the platform had to solve identity and interconnect: single sign-on for operators and systems, and secure integration paths into external partner and vendor networks that money-movement stacks depend on. Ad hoc VPCs and one-off VPN tunnels would not pass scrutiny or keep up with growth.

Initial state

  • No multi-account baseline — core security, logging, and network functions were not separated into dedicated accounts with org-wide guardrails
  • Multi-sovereignty without a pattern — data residency and processing requirements across Americas, EMEA, and India demanded regional isolation without rebuilding the cloud for every jurisdiction
  • Identity gap — teams lacked a unified single sign-on foundation for platform access and consistent identity controls as new accounts and environments came online
  • Partner and vendor interconnect unfinished — external networks that payments and operations relied on needed first-class connectivity into the AWS estate, not one-off tunnels per region
  • Manual provisioning risk — without StackSets and parameterized templates, every new environment would reintroduce drift and audit exposure

Our approach

  • Multi-sovereignty, redundant-region cloud — designed and built a seven-region AWS foundation across the Americas, EMEA, and India with hub-and-spoke transit, Control Tower guardrails, and per-jurisdiction data residency and processing controls—so sovereignty requirements did not force separate, ad hoc cloud estates
  • Core platform, not a one-off VPC — delivered the shared AWS control plane application teams would live on: accounts, networking, DNS, hybrid connectivity, and infrastructure-as-code they could extend
  • Single sign-on foundation — established SSO so operators and systems authenticated consistently across the multi-account organization instead of accumulating per-account credentials and broken joiners/leavers
  • Partner and vendor network integration — designed connectivity and routing patterns that brought external partner and vendor networks into the same transit model as internal workloads—auditable, regional, and repeatable
  • Control Tower customizations — extended AWS Control Tower with a manifest-driven deployment pipeline (CodePipeline, Step Functions, Lambda, and CloudFormation StackSets) for org-wide rollouts
  • Core account topology — dedicated security, logging, network, and shared-services accounts with SSM Parameter Store exports so downstream stacks reference a single source of truth
  • Multi-region transit hub — transit gateways in seven regions with route tables for infrastructure, edge, on-premises/partner, and VPC attachment traffic
  • Spoke VPC factory — parameterized VPC templates with integrated DNS for network, shared-services, and workload accounts across prod, shared-prod, stage, UAT, and SIT tiers
  • Infrastructure as code — version-controlled CloudFormation templates and per-spoke CIDR parameter files so geography and environment additions follow the same pipeline

Outcomes

  • Core AWS platform operational — multi-account organization with Control Tower customizations and StackSet-driven deployments instead of console-driven one-offs
  • Multi-sovereignty ready — regional patterns for Americas, EMEA, and India across production and non-production tiers with residency and processing controls built into the design
  • SSO in place — unified identity access across the platform accounts and environments
  • Partner and vendor networks connected — external interconnect paths integrated into the same hub-and-spoke model as internal workloads
  • Team self-service path — application teams could onboard to standardized spokes rather than negotiating bespoke network and identity builds per project

“Cross-border money movement does not forgive a fragmented cloud. We needed one platform that respected sovereignty, authenticated people and systems the same way everywhere, and plugged partner networks in by design—not by emergency VPN.”

— Platform engineering lead, multi-national money transfer startup (client name withheld)

All case studies · Client testimonials · Interactive video platform scale · Serverless data platform case study · GCCH platform case study · Cloud architecture services

Discuss a similar engagement

General Services Administration
General Services Administration
Headquarters Air Force
Headquarters Air Force
MUFG
MUFG
Sokin
Sokin
GAF
GAF
Department of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
Headquarters Marine Corps
Headquarters Marine Corps
FEMA
FEMA
Air Force Legal Operations Agency
Air Force Legal Operations Agency
Staples
Staples
Find BAComps
Find BAComps
Emory University
Emory University
Dignari
Dignari
NantHealth
NantHealth
AARP
AARP
GetSlim Wellness
GetSlim Wellness